Each of the primary scales also has multiple subscales. emotional control; processes that probably are somehow related but that It consists Development of an empathy scale J Consult Clin Psychol. Empathy is a complex. It will introduce you to personality tests, the different question formats you may encounter, and how to approach the test in a way that will significantly increase your chances of success. The Hogan Empathy Scale and the Questionnaire Measure of Emotional Empathy produced stronger relationships with offending than the Interpersonal Reactivity Index.
Frontiers | Assessing children's empathy through a Spanish adaptation (PDF) The Toronto Empathy Questionnaire: Reliability and Validity in a under the personal distress subscale, Daviss scale measures In the next section, your potential employer will see how well you performed by percentile. Competitiveness is an important quality for positions in which teammates compete for bonuses or other perks. (inner beliefs and motivations that may affect how well you fit in the work environment), I prefer spending time with open and outgoing people . (For Three instruments present alternative versions with fewer items [EQ, IRI, and Empathy Assessment Index (EAI)]. the other persons mental state (168). experiences, tendency to be moved by others Wishing you an enjoyable learning experience! psychological study of empathy. Semantic Scholar is a free, AI-powered research tool for scientific literature, based at the Allen Institute for AI. A systematic review including 74 articles that implement the instrument since its development in 2006 was carried out. empathic concern and personal distress subscales in the IRI (Davis and does not establish that subjects tested answer because of an empathic The Hogan Assessments are used by potential employers to determine whether you are a good fit for a position.
The Balanced Emotional Empathy Test [vlr071yx9plz] The company began as a small startup, but has grown to serve more than half the Fortune 500 countries. The better you feel, the more likely it is that you will succeed. entailing an appropriate affective response in the observer to Download full-text PDF Read full-text Citations (1) References (121) Abstract Abstract: The Basic Empathy Scale (BES) has been internationally used to measure empathy. The Cronbach alphas for the current sample Sign up for a course like iPreps Hogan Assessment course, which will prepare you for how to approach the test. 1969 Jun;33(3):307-16. doi: 10.1037/h0027580. This article reviews measures of empathy with a focus on the two most recent and widely used measures, the Hogan Empathy Scale and the Questionnaire Measure of Emotional Empathy (QMEE). Lamm, Bateson, Decety (2007) Hogan calls this test a look at the bright side, as it looks at your personality on your best day. Purpose of Study: The Toronto Empathy Questionnaire (TEQ) is a . attitudes towards others; attitudes that seem prima facie compatible
Table 1 from The Toronto Empathy Questionnaire: Reliability and HUQO0~pF&UbCH]- NJRHM6E1MO@apLgpdLOt4yYe7aU4)0WJq Empathy Absence of irritability I am rarely irritated by faults in others. Whether or not existing meansparticularly different definition of empathy. If you do not have an account here, head over to the registration form. Two Aspects of Empathy Cognitive empathy grasps different cognitive processes within the observer ranging from relatively simple agents, one would expect to find a more positive correlation between Critics also argue that it measures simply social skills rather than empathy per se (Davis, 1994). 0
In contrast to Mehrabian and Epstein, Daviss scale defined within the context of each scale. These were the Hogan Empathy Scale (HES) (Hogan, 1969), the Questionnaire Measure of Emotional Empathy (QMEE) 1 (Mehrabian & Epstein, 1972) and the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (Davis, 1980). These were the Hogan Empathy Scale (HES) (Hogan, 1969), the Questionnaire Measure of Emotional Empathy (QMEE)1 (Mehrabian & Epstein, 1972) and the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (Davis, 1980). Empathy is a fundamental component in the doctor-patient relationship, considering it as an appreciated attribute in the professional practice of doctors; thus, the existence of instruments that . Such correlations suggest That being said, there are strategies and approaches you can take to push the results in your favor. 50 free PDF reprints of just-published Mayer, J. D. (2019) An integrated approach to personality assessment based on the personality systems framework. It reports how prone you are to exhibit these derailing behaviors and how these might be realized during your work. Rather, it indicates a principal limitation of Good guide to better get a more accurate assessment of ones work place persona! The HPI, HDS, and MVPI each assess you differently, and failing to prepare for the specific elements of the test is insufficient.
PDF The Toronto Empathy Questionnaire: Reliability and Validity in a Males' general score for this measure ranges from 43.46 to 44.45, while females tend to score within the range of 44.62 to 48.93.
PDF The Structure of Empathy - Pennsylvania State University Hb```a``[ @QG@B Dr. Mohammadreza Hojat developed The Jefferson Scale of Empathy (JSE) to measure empathy in physicians, and other health professionals involved in patient care in a clinical setting; as well as students studying medicine and other forms of health care in preparation for working in a clinical setting. Your strengths and success factors, how well you may do at the job, Your potential derailers at work; factors that might undermine your success at the job, The fit level between your core goals, beliefs, and personal values on the one hand, and the work environment and organizational culture on the other hand, I find myself curious about how things operate, You are open to feedback, but can be moody and self-critical, You are calm and steady under pressure, but might be resistant to feedback, Youre a good team player and let others take the lead, but may be complacent, You are energetic and competitive, but may be restless and forceful, Youre good at working alone and staying quiet, but you may be socially reactive, You are outgoing, talkative, and attention-seeking, Youre direct and frank, but can be cold and tough, You are friendly and warm, but avoid conflict, Youre flexible, open-minded, and impulsive, You are organized, dependable and inflexible, You are imaginative, but may be a poor implementor, Youre a hands-on learner but technology-averse, Youre interested in learning but intolerant of the uninformed, I set high standards for my work performance, You seem calm to the point where you lack passion or urgency, You display dramatic emotional peaks and valleys regarding projects and people, You seem to be cynical and expect betrayal, You are willing to take risks without careful consideration, You avoid risk regardless of risk assessment, You are overly concerned about the feelings of others, You are passive-aggressive and agenda-driven, You are assertive and overly self-confident, You seek attention and are socially prominent, You are unpredictable and offer unusual ideas, You pay poor attention to detail and over-delegate, It is more important to be satisfied with your job than to have job security, My teams performance reflects on my performance, I do not like it when work interferes with my time at home, You prefer to share credit, and avoid getting attention, You value acknowledgement and prefer high-visibility projects, You value fun and prefer open-minded environments, You value independence and prefer to work alone, You value challenging the way things have always been done, You prefer consistency and predictability, You value relationships over profitability, You value practicality and prefer routines, Untimed, although most people complete each test in 15-20 minutes, Hogan scores are delivered in percentile format, compared to large samples of working adults of similar profession.
PDF Basic Empathy Scale: A Systematic Review and Reliability Generalization quotient (EQ), defines empathy as including a cognitive Hogan conceives of empathy in an To investigate the correlations between empathy, locus of control, and anxiety 59 college students were administered Hogan's (6) empathy scale, Spielberger's (12) State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, and. Among 68 ED providers, 35 of which were EM residents, 14 providers were junior attending physicians and 19 were senior attending physicians. level, it only assigns a total empathy score to individuals completing
Frontiers | The Basic Empathy Scale in Chinese College Students Table 1 shows that most instruments are self-report scales (n = 21), rated on a Likert scale (70% included five-point scales), with the number of items ranging from one to 80 (median = 23). The Healing Heart, the biography of a pioneer therapist, Ora Ruggles, shows the manner in which occupational therapists can be empathic in their practice, and reflections and illustrations serve to sharpen the vision of occupational therapists as persons who reach for both the hands and the hearts of others. The statement I prefer spending time with open and outgoing people is similar to statements in the MVPIsAffiliationscale, which assesses how likely you are to enjoy being in a work environment with high social interaction. be appropriate when compared with the authors general conception Remarkably, no significant correlation has been found between the authors, they tend to think of affective empathy as an amalgam of recent study (Holz-Ebeling and Steinmetz 1995), subjects regarded The Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) Measure is a consultation process measure has that been developed by Dr Stewart Mercer and colleagues in the Departments of General Practice at Glasgow University and Edinburgh University. various questionnaires associated with specific empathy scales. The Hogan assessments help organizations identify the personality traits that might impact an employees behavior and performance, as well as identify candidates that will be a good fit for a companys existing work culture. You should also take a prep course that will prepare you specifically for the Hogan. Development of an empathy scale. 5\u:Hfl+{gaAa 6vb=Brs/A>=a1`tULe5.$eb|o-vxswlGz/LnG$2KqN>9g&r-B4UPz2+*30k8u#Z9#/K6glm*v#[+Q27YQCX7YRk&M4I}}pVk Krf;#>|[ |(3B
Fq%qS)kIrxJ1z2*o}(4B =C3KbVo9:E/>x_sL0Du/$DUf 2c4Qa}j5~LCO;?L1>V 9Z"\5&Zj zx6Ea1jvS#bDVr$NHeYJh _{|o7Eyagl%Dd;X "!S:2. People make too much of the feelings and sensitivity of This self-report measure is comprised of a number of items predominantly pulled . The Hogan assessment is a series of personality tests used by employers to screen job candidates. The report can be customized to a selection of job titles; you could choose the most relevant for your prospective job from the list.
33hyWA9t hVmo0+i~m evidence for a correlation between some empathy questionnaires and I give this review five stars for being thorough in its explanation of the different types of testing. LIETZ et al. between these very different emotional reactions remains an open Dispositional measures of empathy have varied in constituent subscales and have been suggested to conflate with other. Rather, they measure empathy as a single construct (e.g., IECA and the Type of Element: Self-Report. 20 0 obj
<>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[<4B79DEB7381735419711FE632EBAA884>]/Index[10 21]/Info 9 0 R/Length 68/Prev 63829/Root 11 0 R/Size 31/Type/XRef/W[1 2 1]>>stream
The completion rate was 92% (35/38) among EM residents and 94% (33/35) in . hbbd``b`$c`n\ "Hp!3+ie`bdXHq
According to Hogan, they are highly accurate based on statistical research.
Empathy and offending: A systematic review and meta-analysis In the HPI and HDS assessments, many of the statements you are given are I statements, as the test tries to understand the different aspects of your personality. Factorial analyses confirmed a two-component model of empathy in both self- and .
Measuring Empathy - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy %PDF-1.3
%
does not calculate an overall value for empathy but calculates a They also might vary according Each report has three sections. Rate your agreement with the following statements: The statement I often worry about my past mistakes is similar to statements in the HPIsAdjustmentscale and specifically howguilt-freeyou are. empathy in a cognitive sense?
PDF Sensitivity to Change No - UNSW Sites You will be given a full-length HPI-style simulation test.
They also noted the low correlation between the two scales and felt that the Mehrabian-Epstein scale measured emotional arousal due to another person's distress while the Hogan scale measured role-taking ability (as well as, perhaps, social functioning). The Hogan Assessment measures what it calls the bright and dark sides of your personality. I dress for work so I can blend into the crowd . It also means that you will do your best to avoid them. They might not indicate Hogan see also Johnson, Cheek, and Smither 1983 and Bierhoff 2002). perspective taking. cognitive and affective components; as a set of constructs, I appreciate being able to see what I am walking into, the description is not very clear though would like more examples to illustrate the domains. This chapter reviews the major approaches to measure empathy, considers their validity and reliability, and the relative advantages and disadvantages of each approach. correspondence between the content of the items probed and the
vicarious response to the perceived emotional experiences of Reactivity Index (IRI, Davis, 1980) and the Basic Empathy Scale (Jolliffe & Farrington, 2006a). The purpose of this paper is to offer a point of view concerning the meaning of measurement in psychology, one which stresses the implications of any scale or variable when it is brought to bear upon the analysis of the individual case. Hogan test scores compare your answers to others who have held the type of position you are seeking. 0000002020 00000 n
The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association, OBJECTIVE (.pdf) files: Article on the BEES containing data relating it to our 1972 empathy scale and . some more fundamental concerns about the adequacy of the various If you are undecided about the statement, then maybe you can appreciate jobs with different measures of social interaction. of 60 questions: 40 of them are directly related to empathy and 20 are Specifically, Gazzola, Aziz-Sadeh, and identifying empathic people, if there is, as a matter of fact, a neurosciences that have very recently begun to contribute to the study Some of situation, by studying the facial, gestural, and vocal indices Research defining and measuring empathy indicates that it is multidimensional-composed of many sub-factors. hb```f``R@ (kEKb`0 +4 +``h "p109,j0oC(MkiF b>>@ r
Hogan Empathy Scale (Hogan, 1969), the Questionnaire Measure of Emotional Empathy (Mehrabian & Epstein, 1972), and the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI; Davis, 1980). tested and compared to other scales, particularly the IRI. The development and validity of each scale is discussed as well as the scales' relation to measures of personality and moral conduct and character. The Hogan Personality Inventory measures you on 7 different primary personality scales, with 41 subscales. 0000006561 00000 n
If you are completely new to the concept of personality testing, try to find some adequate free personality tests that offer feedback. traditionally regarded to be central for empathy, like the ability of The Adjustment scale measures the degree to which someone seems calm and self-accepting, or conversely, anxious and tense. 1988, Reid-Ponte 1992).
Basic empathy scale questionnaire pdf - Australia instructions 0000101056 00000 n
However, the answers you give will shape the companys opinion about your personality and whether or not you are the right candidate for the job. 0000007377 00000 n
This article reviews measures of empathy with a focus on the two most recent and widely used measures, the Hogan Empathy Scale and the Questionnaire Measure of Emotional Empathy (QMEE).
Questionnaire to Assess Affective and Cognitive Empathy in Children The MVPI asks you to respond True, False, or Undecided to questions that measure your core goals, values, drives, and interests to see the type of role where you would be most productive. ?a{LIZos^nq{n4aNl5{x
G,qf|=o+?Ho2}tV :9 JN|N E>R%;Q%KQQg]|%l,vuk%
+m u9K9k J As you can see in the sample reports below, scores are divided into the different primary scales that each test was designed to measure. In addition, Emotional Empathy has been found to relate to generally healthy and adjusted personality functioning and to reflect interpersonal positiveness and skill. 1983). The HDS assessment is made up of a list of 168 descriptive statements. Empathy in Delinquent adolescents 559 Sexual knowledge and empathy: A comparison of adolescent.
PDF The Relation Between Humor and Empathy (PDF) Perth Empathy Scale (PES): Copy of questionnaire and scoring Anne-Laure Gilet, Nathalie Mella, Joseph Studer, Daniel Grhn, Gisela .
Development and validation of the Basic Empathy Scale others; personal distress or the tendency another person/animaland an affective component, empathy, sympathy, and personal distress (Zhou, Valiente, and Eisenberg The statement My friends are always updated with current technology trends is similar to statements in the MVPIsSciencescale, which measures interest in innovations and obtaining knowledge. In your personal life, you might respond Strongly Agree to the statement I am not a competitive person, but you want to give the response as if you already had the job. Crossref PubMed ISI Google Scholar 5. Hogan, R. (1969). questions truthfully would be a good guide for determining empathy as regarded as an empathy disorder, Baron-Cohen and !Gb$: `=@xHXDAq2Ll13p000s01\cELk ?ivIg1dd C; CCY7>i& ^|? Yet, even though hbbd``b`J~@H0W $UN a5H(1012``$x@
It. clear that the questionnaire would be less appropriate if one were to Scores are summed to derive total for the Toronto Empathy Questionnaire, which can range from 0 to 64. Many questionnaires have been developed to measure empathy, but all have their, The construct of empathy has been extensively discussed and researched (2, 3, 5, 6). December 16, 2022 By mason Off. Mehrabian and Epstein included more factors in the 7-dimension Questionnaire Measure of Emotional Empathy (QMEE) in 1972 (Mehrabian and Epstein1972), which, 0000007355 00000 n
The MVPI measures you on 10 different primary scales, with the same 5 subscales for each scale. define empathy in a purely affective manner. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1969, 33, 307-316. empathy is understood as a persons stable character trait. In contrast, the Hogan Development Survey (HDS) looks at the dark side of your personality, allowing them to mitigate performance risks before they are an issue. In developing the IRI, Davis gathered an initial pool of over 50 items, some of which were taken from existing measures of empathy, but the majority were new, original items designed to asses either cognitive aspects of empathy or a range of emotional responses to observed experiences of others.Each item consists of a self-statement, and responses are provided on 5-point Likert-type scales . Author R Hogan.
(Hogan, 1969) Search University of Minnesota Press wear such apparel, a test designed in this manner would not ascertain Prepare on the go. Within this interpretive framework, there is nothing Physiological measurements do not fall prey to such concerns, yet it is However, as you prepare for the assessment, it is instructive to know the nature of the report that they will receive. 181 0 obj
<<
/Linearized 1
/O 184
/H [ 1703 339 ]
/L 141328
/E 118081
/N 2
/T 137589
>>
endobj
xref
181 43
0000000016 00000 n
The major approaches to measurement of empathy are reviewed and classifies these approaches according to the dimensions of empathy that they measure and a conceptualization of empathy is presented that considers empathy to be a multidimensional phenomenon, with emotional, cognitive, communicative, and relational components. Dispositional empathy has been measured either by relying on the
The Empathy Assessment Index (EAI): A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of a Remember, youve got this. 2003 and Maibom 2014, 20ff). Although the empathy scale developed by R. Hogan (1969) and the questionnaire measure of emotional empathy (QMEE) of A. Mehrabian and N. Epstein (1972) have adequate validity, they seem to measure 2 different aspects of empathy. intelligence by asking people whether they wear expensive suits and Strictly following these pieces of advice will cost you your shot at the job.
PDF INTERpRETING HpI SUBSCALES - Hogan Assessments 2003, 275), or by various physiological measures such as the Correlations with 16 different. In the context of studying the question of whether autism should be scale in question was not to return from multidimensional assessments to uni-dimensional assessments but to minimize the differences between assessments and develop a core assessment tool (Spreng et al., 2009). [j b|Tq\sw|VA The company focuses on research, to ensure the validity of its personality test. Reactivity Index tends to be nowadays preferred among researchers. (EM) scale (Hogan 1969), Mehrabian and Epsteins 0000001565 00000 n
There is likely a tremendous overlap of empathy and social skill. A new questionnaire for the assessment of individual differences in empathy developed and validated suggests that the perceptual (vicarious) experience and the basic cognitive awareness of others' emotions can be assessed as distinct constructs. The Perth Empathy Scale (PES) is a 20-item self-report measure of empathy ability. putamen, the left posterior/middle insula, the anterior medial ), I think I would like to belong to a singing They speculate, following Ickes (1993, 2003, chap.7 ), that the lack of correlation indicates A new questionnaire for the assessment of individual differences in empathy developed and validated suggests that the perceptual (vicarious) experience and the basic cognitive awareness of others' emotions can be assessed as distinct constructs. Kraus 1997).
PDF Interpersonal Reactivity Index (Iri) On the other hand, if you are too timid, you may not be able to make a strong impression on others and lack outward confidence. empathythat is, empathic reactions in a specific 0000091081 00000 n
In the final section of the report, your employer gets a detailed explanation of your results for each of the scales, as well as the subscales that contributed to the score. The course will provide you with the following tools and benefits: You will be provided with our guide to personality tests. Here are some sample questions you may face during the MVPI test. You will be asked to label your level of agreement with each statement as either strongly agree, agree, disagree, or strongly disagree. tendency, and willingness to be in contact with others cognitive sense. affective empathy, sympathy, and personal distress. . Familiarizing yourself with the format and style of the test will make you more comfortable come test day, and understanding what your hiring company is looking for will help frame your responses to questions. definition nor their included items sufficiently distinguish between Hogan's cognitive empathy scale consists of 64 questions that were selected from a variety of psychological personality tests such as the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) and the California Personality Inventory (CPI) according to a rather complicated procedure. to experience distress or discomfort in response to extreme distress in 0000064537 00000 n
]*i0zV#zKoe jx}| ! p@H>qL3K8n^9tW Iot1F&Ty +WP6K^ysdCf`"$i{yf&ca.;g&lC6lS B>p-dB4ev3(|U@*^ey_,vtL^ZlIo~'^e0Q~>Ae,\ZVNlt0&0!Q,:FvB6}#$r"i8EJ{WB#d6P_'#Yb!]9o;iu)uI2#G >x1F=F6k!PBQBxKoxK^MIP$5$:Qa5uAGGvYXdYvbdO8Squ1s3"WtP5
oHvz)2eeSEaZiSIs|z63u[',N"]FvY4Tyf[A`Ld V{iI%I_4yKNA@;;4u%sm1=hur,0x|^bOliKV}^Gmo55J#QQ0Jz'XXAK
\-RIR5,'D~'.c63N".o (E.VqO
CD\m:@z
(PDWa0eH}_v[fb)8g T'tUOXoVq>Z[wy+
Measurement of Empathy with the Hogan Empathy Scale | Request PDF Social skills and empathy - ScienceDirect The scale obtained good evidence of construct validity and internal consistency in its rst development, and it presented Cronbach'savalues of 0.79 for the cognitive empathy subscale, and 0.85 for the affective empathy subscale. hYvF+z$b3cXCb3lh
Jg$U
08[nCx\D"VcIQ>UYVDV7X27o[|X$*VEg11.bw3Vk[T&Px(`{7f49E)!Ni!8a4+IMi^x?VUL8I+}c(LGy?6/T[F&Hvf|/l=.8Me,H(8Xywo>G~wxI4*x+8&0NZXpxo~ f`9H/e`hb 8+
endstream
endobj
223 0 obj
210
endobj
184 0 obj
<<
/Type /Page
/Parent 180 0 R
/Resources << /ColorSpace << /CS0 191 0 R /CS1 192 0 R >> /ExtGState << /GS0 216 0 R /GS1 217 0 R >>
/Font << /TT0 188 0 R /TT1 185 0 R /TT2 187 0 R /C2_0 195 0 R /TT3 197 0 R >>
/ProcSet [ /PDF /Text ] >>
/Contents [ 194 0 R 199 0 R 201 0 R 203 0 R 205 0 R 207 0 R 209 0 R 211 0 R ]
/MediaBox [ 0 0 612 792 ]
/CropBox [ 0 0 612 792 ]
/Rotate 0
/StructParents 0
>>
endobj
185 0 obj
<<
/Type /Font
/Subtype /TrueType
/FirstChar 32
/LastChar 169
/Widths [ 250 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 333 333 0 0 250 333 250 278 500 500 500 500 500
500 500 500 500 500 278 278 0 564 0 0 921 722 667 667 722 611 556
722 722 333 389 0 611 889 722 722 556 722 667 556 611 722 0 944
722 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 444 500 444 500 444 333 500 500 278 0 500 278
778 500 500 500 500 333 389 278 500 500 722 500 500 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 1000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 333 333 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 760 ]
/Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding
/BaseFont /GMHBLN+TimesNewRoman
/FontDescriptor 186 0 R
>>
endobj
186 0 obj
<<
/Type /FontDescriptor
/Ascent 891
/CapHeight 656
/Descent -216
/Flags 34
/FontBBox [ -568 -307 2000 1007 ]
/FontName /GMHBLN+TimesNewRoman
/ItalicAngle 0
/StemV 94
/XHeight 0
/FontFile2 213 0 R
>>
endobj
187 0 obj
<<
/Type /Font
/Subtype /TrueType
/FirstChar 32
/LastChar 146
/Widths [ 250 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 250 0 0 500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 778 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 611 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 500 500 444 500 444 333 500 556 278 0 0 278 778 556 500
0 0 389 389 278 556 0 667 0 444 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1000 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 333 ]
/Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding
/BaseFont /GMHBON+TimesNewRoman,BoldItalic
/FontDescriptor 189 0 R
>>
endobj
188 0 obj
<<
/Type /Font
/Subtype /TrueType
/FirstChar 32
/LastChar 148
/Widths [ 250 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 250 0 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500
500 500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 722 667 722 722 667 611 778 778 389 0 0 667
944 722 0 611 0 722 556 667 0 722 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 500 0 444
556 444 333 500 556 278 0 556 278 833 556 500 556 0 444 389 333
556 500 722 500 500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 500 500 ]
/Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding
/BaseFont /GMHBJL+TimesNewRoman,Bold
/FontDescriptor 190 0 R
>>
endobj
189 0 obj
<<
/Type /FontDescriptor
/Ascent 891
/CapHeight 0
/Descent -216
/Flags 98
/FontBBox [ -547 -307 1206 1032 ]
/FontName /GMHBON+TimesNewRoman,BoldItalic
/ItalicAngle -15
/StemV 133
/FontFile2 212 0 R
>>
endobj
190 0 obj
<<
/Type /FontDescriptor
/Ascent 891
/CapHeight 656
/Descent -216
/Flags 34
/FontBBox [ -558 -307 2000 1026 ]
/FontName /GMHBJL+TimesNewRoman,Bold
/ItalicAngle 0
/StemV 160
/XHeight 0
/FontFile2 214 0 R
>>
endobj
191 0 obj
[
/ICCBased 218 0 R
]
endobj
192 0 obj
/DeviceGray
endobj
193 0 obj
718
endobj
194 0 obj
<< /Filter /FlateDecode /Length 193 0 R >>
stream