ubuntu-20.10-desktop-amd64.iso everything is fine If instead I try to install the ISO ubuntu-22.04.1-desktop-amd64.iso I get the following error message: "No bootfile found for UEFI! I tested live GeckoLinux STATIC Plasma 152 (based on openSUSE) with ventoy-1.0.15. If the secure boot is enabled in the BIOS, the following screen should be displayed when boot Ventoy at thte first time. I don't remember if the shortcut is ctrl i or ctrl r for grub mode. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_mYChRFanLEdyttDvT-cn6zH0o6KX7Th/view, https://www.mediafire.com/file/5zui8pq5p0p9zug/Windows10_SuperLite_TeamOS_Edition.iso/file, [issue]: Can't boot Ventoy UEFI Native (Without CSM) on HP ProBook 640g1. It means that the secure boot solution doesn't work with your machine, so you need to turn off the option, and disable secure boot in the BIOS. The current Secure Boot implementation should be renamed from "Secure Boot support" to "Secure Boot circumvention/bypass", the documentation should state about its pros and cons, and Ventoy should probably ask to delete enrolled key (or at least include KeyTool, it's open-source). As Ventoy itself is not signed with Microsoft key. Guid For Ventoy With Secure Boot in UEFI So, this is debatable. | 5 GB, void-live-x86_64-20191109-xfce.iso | 780 MB, refracta10-beta5_xfce_amd64-20200518_0033.iso | 800 MB, devuan_beowulf_3.0.0_amd64_desktop-live.iso | 1.10 GB, drbl-live-xfce-2.6.2-1-amd64.iso | 800 MB, kali-linux-2020-W23-live-amd64.iso | 2.88 GB, blackarch-linux-live-2020.06.01-x86_64.iso | 14 GB, cucumber-linux-1.1-x86_64-basic.iso | 630 MB, BlankOn-11.0.1-desktop-amd64.iso | 1.8 GB, openmamba-livecd-en-snapshot-20200614.x86_64.iso | 1.9 GB, sol-11_3-text-x86.iso | 600 MB There are two bugs in Ventoy: Unsigned bootloader Linux ISOs or ISOs without UEFI support does not boot with Secure Boot enabled. Say, we disabled validation policy circumvention and Secure Boot works as it should. @pbatard, if that's what what your concern, that could be easily fixed by deleting grubia32.efi and grubx64.efi in /EFI/BOOT, and renaming grubia32_real.efi grubia32.efi, grubx64_real.efi grubx64.efi. Just like what is the case with Ventoy, I don't have much of an issue with having some leeway, on account that implementing proper signature validation requires some effort, during which unsigned bootloaders may be accepted, so as not inconvenience users too much. But Ventoy currently does. Are you using an grub2 External Menu (F6)? if you want can you test this too :) I am just resuming my work on it. unsigned .efi file still can not be chainloaded. But, currently, that is not the case at all, which means that, independently of the merits of Secure Boot for this or that type of media (which is a completely different debate altogether), there is a breach of the security contract that the user expects to see enforced and therefore something that needs to be addressed. Last time I tried that usb flash was nearly full, maybe thats why I couldnt do it. Already on GitHub? Official FAQ I have checked the official FAQ. PS: It works fine with original ventoy release (use UEFIinSecureBoot) when Secure boot is enabled. The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: tails-amd64-4.5.iso Legacy tested with VM Getting the same error with Arch Linux. Acronis True Image 2020 24.6.1 Build 25700 in Legacy is working in Memdisk mode on 1.0.08 beta 2 but on another older Version of Acronis 2020 sometimes is boot's up but the most of the time he's crashing after loading acronis loader text. only ventoy give error "No bootfile found for UEFI! and select the efisys.bin from desktop and save the .iso Now the Minitool.iso should boot into UEFI with Ventoy. Link: https://www.mediafire.com/file/5zui8pq5p0p9zug/Windows10_SuperLite_TeamOS_Edition.iso/file Ventoy loads Linux kernels directly, which are also signed with embedded Shim certificate. for grub modules, maybe I can pack all the modules into one grub.efi and for other efi files(e.g. the main point of Secure Boot is to allow TPM to validate the running system before releasing stored keys, isn't it? 1.0.84 IA32 www.ventoy.net ===> I was just objecting to your claim that Secure Boot is useless when someone has physical access to the device, which I don't think is true, as it is still (afaik) required for TPM-based encryption to work correctly. 1.0.84 BIOS www.ventoy.net ===> I don't know why. The injection is just like that I extract the ubuntu.iso and change/add some script and create an new ISO file. Secure Boot was supported from Ventoy 1.0.07, an option for secure boot is added in Ventoy2Disk.exe/Ventoy2Disk.sh. I didn't expect this folder to be an issue. Must hardreset the System. Download Debian net installer. Would disabling Secure Boot in Ventoy help? Where can I download MX21_February_x64.iso? From the booted OS, they are then free to do whatever they want to the system. Do I need a custom shim protocol? I'm considering two ways for user to select option 1. Only in 2019 the signature validation was enforced. If you want you can toggle Show all devices option, then all the devices will be in the list. This solution is only for Legacy BIOS, not UEFI. Yes. Have a question about this project? Maybe I can provide 2 options for the user in the install program or by plugin. You can reformat it with FAT32/NTFS/UDF/XFS/Ext2/Ext3/Ext4 filesystem, the only request is that Cluster Size must greater than or equal to 2048. Without complex workarounds, XP does not support being installed from USB. Yes. All other distros can not be booted. If you want you can toggle Show all devices option, then all the devices will be in the list. its okay. Users enabled Secure Boot to be warned if a boot loader fails Secure Boot validation, regardless of where that bootloader is executed from. The point of this issue is that people are under the impression that because Ventoy supports Secure Boot, they will get the same level of "security" booting Secure Boot compliant media through Ventoy as if they had booted that same media directly, which is indeed a fair expectation to have, since the whole point of boot media creation software is to have the converted media behave as close as possible as the original would. size 5580453888 bytes (5,58 GB) If you really want to mount it, you can use the experimental option VTOY_LINUX_REMOUNT in Global Control Plugin. But that not means they trust all the distros booted by Ventoy. For Hiren's BootCD HBCD_PE_x64.iso has been tested in UEFI mode. Intel Sunrise Point-LP, Intel Kaby Lake-R, @chromer030 Your favorite, APorteus was done with legacy & UEFI Earlier (2014-2019) official GRUB in Ubuntu and Debian allowed to boot any Linux kernel, even unsigned one, in Secure Boot mode. If Ventoy was intended to be used from an internal hard disk, I would agree with you, but Ventoy is a USB-based multiboot solution and therefore the user must have physical access to the system, so it is the users responsibility to be careful about what he inserts into that USB port. The problem of manjaro-kde-20.0-pre1-stable-staging-200406-linux56.iso in UEFI booting was an issue in ISO file , resolved on latest released ISO today : @FadeMind If that was the case, I would most likely sign Ventoy for my SHIM (provided it doesn't let through unsigned bootloaders when Secure Boot is enabled, which is the precise issue we are trying to solve) since, even if it's supposed to be a competitor of Rufus, I think it's a very nice solution and I'm always more than happy to direct people who would like to have a multiboot version of Rufus to use Ventoy instead. 3. But unless it exploits a Secure Boot vulnerability or limitation (or you get cozy with the folks controlling shim keys), that bootloader should require to be enrolled to pass Secure Boot validation, in the same manner as Ventoy does it. Now Rufus has achieved support for secure boot as now NTFS:UEFI Driver is signed for secure boot by Microsoft. In this quick video guide I will show you how to fix the error:No bootfile found for UEFI!Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI!I had this problem on my . An encoding issue, perhaps (for the text)? @ValdikSS Thanks, I will test it as soon as possible. What exactly is the problem? 6. Happy to be proven wrong, I learned quite a bit from your messages. Latest Laptop UEFI 64+SECURE BOOT ON Blocked message. Legacy\UEFI32\UEFI64 boot? The Flex image does not support BIOS\Legacy boot - only UEFI64. This same image I boot regularly on VMware UEFI. Some bioses have a bug. Users may run into issues with Ventoy not working because of corrupt ISO files, which will create problems when booting an image file. chromeos_14816.99.0_reven_recovery_stable-channel_mp-v2.bin fails to boot on BIOS & UEFI. same here on ThinkPad x13 as for @rderooy Hi MFlisar , if you want use that now with HBCD you must extract the iso but the ventoy.dat on the root of the iso recreate the iso with example: ntlite oder oder tools and than you are able to boot from. If someone has physical access to a system then Secure Boot is useless period. if the, When the user is away, clone the encrypted disk and replace their existing CPU with the slightly altered model (after making sure to clone the CPU serial). Ventoy does not always work under VBox with some payloads. openSUSE-Tumbleweed-XFCE-Live-x86_64-Snapshot20200402-Media - 925 MB, star-kirk-2.1.0-xfce-amd64-live.iso - 518 MB, Porteus-CINNAMON-v5.0rc1-x86_64.iso - 300 MB for the suggestions. For these who select to bypass secure boot. Seriously? . orel-2.12.22-26.12.2019_13.14.livecd.iso - 1.1 GB I can provide an option in ventoy.json for user who want to bypass secure boot. (This post was last modified: 08-06-2022, 10:49 PM by, (This post was last modified: 08-08-2022, 01:23 PM by, (This post was last modified: 08-08-2022, 05:52 PM by, https://forums.ventoy.net/showthread.phpt=minitool, https://rmprepusb.blogspot.com/2018/11/art-to.html. And unfortunately, because Ventoy is derived from GRUB 2.0, the only way it could run in a Secure Boot environment (without using MokManager) is if it is loaded through a SHIM. After installation, simply click the Start Scan button and then press on Repair All. Sorry, I meant to upgrade from the older version of Windows 11 to 22H2. Is there any progress about secure boot support? Both are good. The MEMZ virus nyan cat as an image file produces a very weird result, It also happens when running Ventoy in QEMU, The MEMZ virus nyan cat as an image file produces a very weird result Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. @shasheene of Rescuezilla knows about the problem and they are investigating. Rufus or WoeUSB, in several meaningful ways.The program does not extract ISO images or other image formats to the USB drive but . If anyone has an issue - please state full and accurate details. ", same error during creating windows 7 I'll try looking into the changelog on the deb package and see if Sorry for my ignorance. . Something about secure boot? Secure Boot is tricky to deal with and can (rightfully) be seen as a major inconvenience instead of yet another usually desireable line of defence against malware (but by all means not a panacea). Just create a FAT32 partition, change its label to ARCH_YYYYMM (fill in the ISO's date, now it would be ARCH_202109) and extract the Arch ISO to it. 1. Vmware) with UEFI mode and to confirm that the ISO file does support UEFI mode. This means current is UEFI mode. Installation & Boot. using the direct ISO download method on MS website. Will polish and publish the code later. Adding an efi boot file to the directory does not make an iso uefi-bootable. Does the iso boot from s VM as a virtual DVD? "No bootfile found for UEFI! I'm not sure how Ventoy can make use of that boot process, because, in a Secure Boot enabled environment, all UEFI:NTFS accomplishes is that it allows you to chain load a Secure Boot signed UEFI boot loader from an NTFS partition, and that's it. Hiren does not have this so the tools will not work. You were able to use TPM for disk encryption long before Secure Boot, and rightfully so, since the process of storing and using data encryption keys is completely different from the process of storing and using trust chain keys to validate binary executables (being able to decrypt something is very different from being able to trust something). 3. Some known process are as follows: For the two bugs. When secure boot is enabled, only .efi/kernel/drivers need to be signed. Main Edition Support. Please test and tell your opinion. Format UDF in Windows: format x: /fs:udf /q If I am using Ventoy and I went the trouble of enrolling it for Secure Boot, I don't expect it to suddenly flag any unsigned or UEFI bootloader or bootloader with a broken signature, as bootable in a Secure Boot enabled environment. Thank you for your suggestions! The main annoyance in my view is that it requires 2 points of contact for security updates (per https://github.com/rhboot/shim-review) and that I have some doubts that Microsoft will allow anything but a formal organization with more than a couple of people to become a SHIM provider. Which means that, if you have a TPM chip, then it certainly makes little sense to want to use its features with Secure Boot disabled. la imagen iso,bin, etc debe ser de 64 bits sino no la reconoce That would be my preference, because someone who wants to bypass Secure Boot indiscriminately, without disabling Secure Boot altogether, should have a clue what they are doing, and the problem with presenting options as a dialog is that you end up with tutorials that advise users to pick the less secure option, because whoever wrote happened to find the other choices inconvenient without giving much thought about the end result. Tested on 1.0.57 and 1.0.79. And for good measure, clone that encrypted disk again. Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI! I'll test it on a real hardware a bit later. If anyone has Secure Boot enabled, there should be no scenario where an unsigned bootloader gets executed without at least a big red warning, even if the user indicated that they were okay with that. I installed ventoy-1.0.32 and replace the .efi files. In Linux, you need to specify the device to install Ventoy which can be a USB drive or local disk. The live folder is similar to Debian live. So all Ventoy's behavior doesn't change the secure boot policy. Tested on ASUS K40IN 5. extservice plzz help. Therefore, unless Ventoy makes it very explicit that "By enrolling Ventoy for Secure Boot, you understand that you are also granting anyone with the capability of running non Secure Boot enabled boot loaders on your computer, including potential malicious ones that would otherwise have been detected by Secure Boot", I will maintain that there is a rather important security issue that needs to be addressed. When it asks Delete the key (s), select Yes. Even though I copied the Windows 10 ISO to flash drive, which presumably has a UEFI boot image on it, neither of my Vostros would recognize it. ventoy.json should be placed at the 1st partition which has the larger capacity (The partition to store ISO files). So thanks a ton, @steve6375! Yes. SB works using cryptographic checksums and signatures. Agreed. I've made some tests this evening, it should be possible to make more-or-less proper Secure Boot support in Ventoy, but that would require modification of grub code to use shim protocol, and digital signatures for all Ventoy efi files, modules, etc. Ventoy Binary Notes: This website is underprovisioned, so please download ventoy in the follows: (remember to check the SHA-256 hash) https://github.com/ventoy/Ventoy/releases Source Code Ventoy's source code is maintained on both Github and Gitee. Getting the same error as @rderooy. The user has Ubuntu, Fedora and OpenSUSE ISOs which they want to load. Thanks very much for proposing this great OS , tested and added to report. Tested ISO: https://github.com/rescuezilla/rescuezilla/releases/download/2.4/rescuezilla-2.4-64bit.jammy.iso. What system are you booting from? Hi, Gentoo LiveDVD doesn't work, when I try to boot it, It's showing up the GRUB CLI I've already disabled secure boot. Which brings us nicely to what this is all about: Mitigation. 2. In a fit of desperation, I tried another USB drive - this one 64GB instead of 8GB. Option1: Use current solution(Super UEFIinSecureBoot Disk), then user will be clearly told that, in this case, the secure boot will be by passed. Of course, there are ways to enable proper validation. Well, that's pretty much exactly what I suggested in points 1-4 from the original post, with point 4 altered from "an error should be returned to the user and bootx64.efi should not be launched" to "an error should be returned to the user who can then decide if they still want to launch bootx64.efi". Do I still need to display a warning message? @steve6375 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1401532. It gets to the root@archiso ~ # prompt just fine using first boot option. By default, the ISO partition can not be mounted after boot Linux (will show device busy when you mount). Let the user access their computer (fat chance they're going to remove the heatsink and thermal paste to see if their CPU was changed, especially if, as far as they are concerned, no change as occurred and both the computer appearance and behaviour are indistinguishable from usual). There are many kinds of WinPE. I've made another patched preloader with Secure Boot support. https://abf.openmandriva.org/platforms/cooker/products/4/product_build_lists/3250 Have you tried grub mode before loading the ISO? unsigned kernel still can not be booted. Also ZFS is really good. DiskGenius Already on GitHub? Topics in this forum are automatically closed 6 months after creation. So all Ventoy's behavior doesn't change the secure boot policy. However, some ISO files dont support UEFI mode so booting those files in UEFI will not work. We recommend downloading this PC Repair tool (rated Great on TrustPilot.com) to easily address them. . If a user is booting a lot of unsigned bootloaders with Secure Boot enabled, they clearly should disable Secure Boot in their settings, because, for what they are doing, it is pretty much pointless. @ventoy I can confirm this, using the exact same iso. First and foremost, disable legacy boot (AKA BIOS emulation). Windows 7 32-bit does not support UEFI32 - you must use Win7 64-bit.. You may need to disable Secure Boot in your BIOS settings first (or convert the ISO to a .imgPTN23 file using the MPI Tool Kit). yes, but i try with rufus, yumi, winsetuptousb, its okay. This means current is 32bit UEFI mode. Hi, HDClone 9.0.11 ISO is stating on UEFI succesfully but on Legacy after choose "s" or "x64" to start hdclone it open's a black windows in front of the Ventoy Menu and noting happens more. screenshots if possible Freebsd has some linux compatibility and also has proprietary nvidia drivers. It is designed to protect a system against malicious code being loaded and executed early in the boot process, before the operating system has been loaded. ElementaryOS boots just fine. Tested Distros (Updating) I don't have a IA32 hardware device, so I normally test it in VMware. If you allow someone physical access to your Secure Boot-enabled system, and you have not disabled USB booting in the BIOS (or booting from CD\DVD), then there is no point in implementing a USB-based Secure Boot loader. Sign in Oooh, ok, I read up a bit on how PCR registers work during boot, and now it makes much more sense. Many thousands of people use Ventoy, the website has a list of tested ISOs. It says that no bootfile found for uefi. You need to create a directory with name ventoy and put ventoy.json in this directory(that is \ventoy\ventoy.json). When enrolling Ventoy, they do not. Ventoy virtualizes the ISO as a cdrom device and boot it. Already have an account? Maybe the image does not support x64 uefi . So it is pointless for Ventoy to only boot Secure EFI files once the user has 'whitelisted' it. So, Ventoy can also adopt that driver and support secure boot officially. etc. For these who select to bypass secure boot. Ventoy is an open source tool to create a bootable USB drive for ISO/WIM/IMG/VHD (x)/EFI files. Joined Jul 18, 2020 Messages 4 Trophies 0 . In this case, try renaming the efi folder as efixxx, and then see if you get a legacy boot option. Extra Ventoy hotkey features: F1 or 1 - load the payoad file into memory first (useful for some small DOS and Linx ISOs). The user could choose to run a Microsoft Windows Install ISO downloaded from the MS servers and Ventoy could inject a malicious file into it as it boots. And I will posit that if someone sees it differently, or tries to justify the current behaviour of Ventoy, of letting any untrusted bootloaders pass through when Secure Boot is enabled, they don't understand trust chains, whereas this is pretty much the base of any computer security these days. I would say that it probably makes sense to first see what LoadImage()/StarImage() let through in an SB enabled environment (provided that this is what Ventoy/GRUB uses behind the scenes, which I'm not too sure about), and then decide if it's worth/possible to let users choose to run unsigned bootloaders.